You can't predict the time

[viniu]

So tnt run has a 7 minutes game time, and many times it is not enough to someone win, so it could start in 0 seconds and the match only would end when someone wins the game, because it is annoying when there are 2 players and the time ends and no one wins, so when time end players could get a win, or make the time infinite,

I also think we have really big maps, to a little number of players, so it takes an whole year to someone win, so i guess the number of players should be 24, because the maps are too big and the matchs would be more fun with more players

 

[RubbaDubRob]

I agree... if there are pro players and big maps, it will take long for someone to win. We need smaller maps at least

View reply.

 

[TheCooki3Cat]

Well I can understand why they added time because of how big the maps are. And like eventually someone is going to get tired from an infinite game. I think with big maps there should be a time limit set because then it just makes it fair for everyone in the game. And even if no one wins, does it not give you exp or coins for surviving? If so then I don't really see a need for having unlimited time...(imo)

I agree... if there are pro players and big maps, it will take long for someone to win. We need smaller maps at least

Still I agree with this by making the maps smaller, the whole issue I'm finding with many players is the size of the specific games maps. But I don't think there shouldn't be a time limit. And we can't really even garuntee that the non-forum users will like the idea either. (I can understand if you wanna go head-to-head with friends, but we also have to consider the non-forum players)...(again imo)

View reply.

 

[TheCooki3Cat]

And I also agree with the idea of more players for bigger maps. <3

View reply.

 

[SplashingPaint836]

That happened to me when I was playing against a hacker. I got a loss from it which is unfair since I didn’t die.

Game time should be increased to like 15 minutes.

View reply.

 

[SplashingPaint836]

This also happens with every tie in games with timers. You both loose. Except Splatter, when it’s 50/50 it randomly picks a winner. And TBB(S) they are just stacked randomly from 1st to 3rd place.

View reply.

 

[TheCooki3Cat]

But why would you want to have an infinite game against a hack, what will that help? Like if you know their hacking then why bother staying in the game? Making the time longer won't really prove anything, you'll still end up losing. Even if they made the time longer people are still going to lose and that won't change. Making the time longer won't make a huge difference. Someone will still win.

And to re-mention my question. Do you still get exp and coins for tieing? If so then like, why? Your still getting a reward for the effort. You don't always have to win a game, even if they did give y'all the unlimited time then what would be next?

View reply.

 

[TheCooki3Cat]

And If I'm being really honest...If i died and had to spectate an infinite game then that would be really boring and I would've left instantly...like think of it in terms of mm...if you look at it in that point of view its the exact same, only difference is someone has a sword and someone has a gun. People still running for a specific amount of time.

That's fr playing an infinite game of mm or sw....If i'm correct all the games have a time-limit...

View reply.

 

[viniu]

And If I'm being really honest...If i died and had to spectate an infinite game then that would be really boring and I would've left instantly...like think of it in terms of mm...if you look at it in that point of view its the exact same, only difference is someone has a sword and someone has a gun. People still running for a specific amount of time.

That's fr playing an infinite game of mm or sw....If i'm correct all the games have a time-limit...

I understand your point, but mm are a different game and it doesn't work how tnt run does, well, yes we get points and exp but it is not enough to players who wants to win a game

Well I can understand why they added time because of how big the maps are. And like eventually someone is going to get tired from an infinite game. I think with big maps there should be a time limit set because then it just makes it fair for everyone in the game. And even if no one wins, does it not give you exp or coins for surviving? If so then I don't really see a need for having unlimited time...(imo)


Still I agree with this by making the maps smaller, the whole issue I'm finding with many players is the size of the specific games maps. But I don't think there shouldn't be a time limit. And we can't really even garuntee that the non-forum users will like the idea either. (I can understand if you wanna go head-to-head with friends, but we also have to consider the non-forum players)...(again imo)

And the game will have to end, since blocks are always falling, so there will be a winner anyways

But why would you want to have an infinite game against a hack, what will that help? Like if you know their hacking then why bother staying in the game? Making the time longer won't really prove anything, you'll still end up losing. Even if they made the time longer people are still going to lose and that won't change. Making the time longer won't make a huge difference. Someone will still win.

And to re-mention my question. Do you still get exp and coins for tieing? If so then like, why? Your still getting a reward for the effort. You don't always have to win a game, even if they did give y'all the unlimited time then what would be next?

And as i said, the floor will always falling, and if the hacker won, well, we can hope he gets banned

View reply.

 

[viniu]

And we will never please everybody, when they added the new lobbies it got a wave of hate in every server of brokenlens, so some will like my suggestion and others not

View reply.

 

[TheCooki3Cat]

And we will never please everybody, when they added the new lobbies it got a wave of hate in every server of brokenlens, so some will like my suggestion and others not

Oh I never said to please everybody, I just said we need to take all the players into consideration. Not everyone is going to be pleased, yes that I know.

But still all the games have time limits to them...so idk..But yes I do understand where your coming from!!

View reply.

 

[cursedd]

just make it so ties aren’t a loss

View reply.

 

[TheCooki3Cat]

just make it so ties aren’t a loss

That I agree on. <3

View reply.

 

[SplashingPaint836]

But why would you want to have an infinite game against a hack, what will that help? Like if you know their hacking then why bother staying in the game? Making the time longer won't really prove anything, you'll still end up losing. Even if they made the time longer people are still going to lose and that won't change. Making the time longer won't make a huge difference. Someone will still win.

And to re-mention my question. Do you still get exp and coins for tieing? If so then like, why? Your still getting a reward for the effort. You don't always have to win a game, even if they did give y'all the unlimited time then what would be next?

I suggested to add more time for TNT Run not make it infinite. Hackers are hackers. You can just leave if you want or stay to the end. I don’t know why I said the first part but those two were supposed to be separated things.

Adding more time is good because it gives more playing time to people who are good at a game that NEEDS it in order to triumph. There’s really nothing wrong about more time. If you get bored with more time than you should’ve known that not everyone is a noob who lasts 30 seconds.

That’s true you still get the rewards I believe but it is still unfair that a tie equals a loss.

I agree that I don’t think many people will stick around to spectate someone for 10 minutes or so, but why even spectate them in the first place if you are going to get bored midway.

View reply.

 

[TheCooki3Cat]

I suggested to add more time for TNT Run not make it infinite. Hackers are hackers. You can just leave if you want or stay to the end. I don’t know why I said the first part but those two were supposed to be separated things.

Adding more time is good because it gives more playing time to people who are good at a game that NEEDS it in order to triumph. There’s really nothing wrong about more time. If you get bored with more time than you should’ve known that not everyone is a noob who lasts 30 seconds.

That’s true you still get the rewards I believe but it is still unfair that a tie equals a loss.

I agree that I don’t think many people will stick around to spectate someone for 10 minutes or so, but why even spectate them in the first place if you are going to get bored midway.

Yes and I did agree that if making ties not a loos would make it okay. <3

View reply.

 

[AllyMac_]

This also happens with every tie in games with timers. You both loose. Except Splatter, when it’s 50/50 it randomly picks a winner. And TBB(S) they are just stacked randomly from 1st to 3rd place.

I think (if memory serves me right) in TBB it's alphabetical- if there is a tie then "AllyMac" wins over "SplashingPaint" but maybe I'm crazy- I haven't played TBB in a couple of years

View reply.

 

[AllyMac_]

I agree with you Vini- I think the time should be increased. I don't think the number of players will work b/c (when I'm on) there are usually only 5-10 players per round although it wouldn't hurt anything to increase that too - 15 minutes like Splash said sounds reasonable to me

View reply.

 

[AllyMac_]

Solved- time is 10 minutes now - gj Vini

View reply.