What Is The Time Extent For Replying To Old Threads?

[Klassux]

Here Was A Post From Jan. 17 - And Someone Replied On March 2.

 

[KillerWither]

I’m auctually not sure. Maybe 5-6 months or so idk. I’ll tag staff. @DarkRainbows @ssunsett @Aypi

View reply.

 

[BlueLeLilDutchAD]

I think different people have different perspectives on what the timing is because if there was a set time I would know about it by now :/

View reply.

 

[Ripcord]

In my view, replying to old threads shoudn't be a problem.

People or staff members shouldn't say to not reply to old threads.
Like Cmon.
We're just trying to revive that old thead or just replying with our answer.
What's the big deal here?

View reply.

 

[Shive]

I think 1-3 weeks would be considered an old thread.

View reply.

 

[~Sam]

If they don't want us replying to old threads they would have think to lock that old thread.

View reply.

 

[Klassux]

I’m auctually not sure. Maybe 5-6 months or so idk. I’ll tag staff. @DarkRainbows @ssunsett @Aypi

I Was Thinking Around 1 - 2 Months :/

I think different people have different perspectives on what the timing is because if there was a set time I would know about it by now :/

Yeah, I Think I Would To....

In my view, replying to old threads shoudn't be a problem.

People or staff members shouldn't say to not reply to old threads.
Like Cmon.
We're just trying to revive that old thead or just replying with our answer.
What's the big deal here?

Well, Replying To Old Threads Is Not A Good Thing, Because, Most Reasons I See In It Is, Like The One I Showed, That Problem Had Already Been Solved. @DarkRainbows @ender_bintang

I think 1-3 weeks would be considered an old thread.

That Sounds To Little .3.

If they don't want us replying to old threads they would have think to lock that old thread.

Well, They Don't Lock FAQ Threads For A Reason. It's Because That It Doesn't Need To Be.

View reply.

 

[KillerWither]

I Was Thinking Around 1 - 2 Months :/

Yeah, I Think I Would To....

Well, Replying To Old Threads Is Not A Good Thing, Because, Most Reasons I See In It Is, Like The One I Showed, That Problem Had Already Been Solved. @DarkRainbows @ender_bintang

That Sounds To Little .3.

Well, They Don't Lock FAQ Threads For A Reason. It's Because That It Doesn't Need To Be.

Before I made many hack reports like a year ago, and to this day they still haven't been banned which sucks. :/

View reply.

 

[Klassux]

That's Why I'm So Eager For Aypi And DarkRainbows To Get Mod. I Think They Would Be Better At Making Sure That None Are Missed ;3

View reply.

 

[Laura_Aria]

It depends on what the thread topic is.

View reply.

 

[ToastyLeggings]

It should be around a couple of months, bumping on old threads can be annoying and just really unnecessary.

View reply.

 

[ToastyLeggings]

Before I made many hack reports like a year ago, and to this day they still haven't been banned which sucks. :/

Are they still active, and are they still using hacks? If so I would suggest making a new thread tagging staff members. Using the command /report is also an option.

View reply.

 

[WarriorGirl3333]

It depends on what the thread topic is.

Exactly.

There's no exact 'time limit'
As a general rule, if it's irrelevent/resolved/going to bring up old drama or issues/going to restart a spammy thread, don't respond to it.
If it's unresolved (and the player is still active)/relevent/not a spammy thread, go for it.

View reply.

 

[EVILBANANA12345]

After it has left the New Posts I conciter it an old thread but I won't get mad about it unless it was made in like January
current date March 6th

View reply.