Question :)

PandeeDEATH said:
though isnt half this rule kind of implimented? ?3? "no staff impersonation"
i do agree with howl on this one though i mean a few months ago a staff actually believed that rule rumor and banned many innocents because of it though i dont renember which staff~ and another said it was glitch exploit and banned more innocents it could very much happen to any new staff if they are ill informed
.3. just a thought is all
maybe just add a warning in the book to try and find proof before telling whats a rule or not
Click to expand...
This is exactly what I mean :)
View reply.
 
PandeeDEATH said:
though isnt half this rule kind of implimented? ?3? "no staff impersonation"
i do agree with howl on this one though i mean a few months ago a staff actually believed that rule rumor and banned many innocents because of it though i dont renember which staff~ and another said it was glitch exploit and banned more innocents it could very much happen to any new staff if they are ill informed
.3. just a thought is all
maybe just add a warning in the book to try and find proof before telling whats a rule or not
Click to expand...
Which rumour was it?
View reply.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Back
Top