I'm sorry, but this has not enough evidence

[viniu]

Lol it happens in every game

In run mostly time a player crashes or are a hacker

View reply.

 

[Snowflakss]

In run mostly time a player crashes or are a hacker

This is why I stopped playing it in case I get false ban hammer
Umm I’ll leave now uhh bye

View reply.

 

[KingWolfy]

I’m kinda neutral.

I’m not gonna say anything because I don’t wanna be bombarded by 15 kids

View reply.

 

[xMarshmello]

If you judge the both images, you’ll see he probably glitched out. I’ve seen the first image that the part of the map that has ladder was totally removed, and the player was on that part while he got glitched. So I think the reporter decided to remove the part where he/she can get this guy false ban. I’ll try to prove it, as long as I can.

First, have you noticed that he was on the ladder part of the map? isn’t there are 4 places that has ladders in each corners on that map? He was on the ladder the time he lagged, so assume that the photo was taken after the reported removed some parts of the map, so that it’ll look like he is flying. If you don’t believe me take a look :

Have you seen that piece of ladder left? I sure you do, so it is considered that the parts were just removed.

Second, Did you judge both images? I guess you did, but still it didn’t work. It was clearly that parts were remove, I can see some tiny pieces of the parts in this image :

Saw that? You did, so don’t assume that the player who’s innocent enough removed that. How can the second image be the same position of his place if he removed that. It was captured on a different angle, that’s why.

Third, Differences of each image. Do you ever think that you should take what are the differences of every images? It’s not based on angles, it’s based on how you judge it. Well, look at this :

Missing piece right? So how about this one as well.

Missing as well, so fair enough. Image are completely the same, the block was removed and it is removed on the other image as well.

Fourth, we can’t still provide a better evidence here. So why not take a look at the measurement of each blocks and the player position.
Let’s take a look : 3x2

Now, on the players position.

It is 2 block high, so let’s look at the other one.

Looks like 1 and ½ block height right? It’s because it’s on the different angle.

Lastly, what does it really look like when you are really lagging or using hacks but pretending that you’re lagging?

Here :

Head is more likely looking down. ‘If hacking’

Head is not looking down, it can be above if ever. But no more no less. ‘If lagging’

This are the evidence I see based on this innocent player, If this is not enough for you. Well, I can not do anything about it, it’s their decision.

@ssunsett In case, you didn’t notice this evidence.

View reply.

 

[FloofehGuinea]

If you judge the both images, you’ll see he probably glitched out. I’ve seen the first image that the part of the map that has ladder was totally removed, and the player was on that part while he got glitched. So I think the reporter decided to remove the part where he/she can get this guy false ban. I’ll try to prove it, as long as I can.

First, have you noticed that he was on the ladder part of the map? isn’t there are 4 places that has ladders in each corners on that map? He was on the ladder the time he lagged, so assume that the photo was taken after the reported removed some parts of the map, so that it’ll look like he is flying. If you don’t believe me take a look :
View attachment 168834
Have you seen that piece of ladder left? I sure you do, so it is considered that the parts were just removed.

Second, Did you judge both images? I guess you did, but still it didn’t work. It was clearly that parts were remove, I can see some tiny pieces of the parts in this image : View attachment 168837 Saw that? You did, so don’t assume that the player who’s innocent enough removed that. How can the second image be the same position of his place if he removed that. It was captured on a different angle, that’s why.

Third, Differences of each image. Do you ever think that you should take what are the differences of every images? It’s not based on angles, it’s based on how you judge it. Well, look at this :
View attachment 168838 Missing piece right? So how about this one as well.
View attachment 168839 Missing as well, so fair enough. Image are completely the same, the block was removed and it is removed on the other image as well.

Fourth, we can’t still provide a better evidence here. So why not take a look at the measurement of each blocks and the player position.
Let’s take a look : 3x2
View attachment 168840 View attachment 168841
Now, on the players position.
View attachment 168842
It is 2 block high, so let’s look at the other one.
View attachment 168843
Looks like 1 and ½ block height right? It’s because it’s on the different angle.

Lastly, what does it really look like when you are really lagging or using hacks but pretending that you’re lagging?

Here :
View attachment 168845 Head is more likely looking down. ‘If hacking’
View attachment 168846
Head is not looking down, it can be above if ever. But no more no less. ‘If lagging’

This are the evidence I see based on this innocent player, If this is not enough for you. Well, I can not do anything about it, it’s their decision.

We’ll just have to wait and see what Ssun says

View reply.

 

[xMarshmello]

We just have to wait and see what Ssun says

Yeah, I am waiting. I hope she gives the best and the right decision!

View reply.

 

[dist]

If you judge the both images, you’ll see he probably glitched out. I’ve seen the first image that the part of the map that has ladder was totally removed, and the player was on that part while he got glitched. So I think the reporter decided to remove the part where he/she can get this guy false ban. I’ll try to prove it, as long as I can.

First, have you noticed that he was on the ladder part of the map? isn’t there are 4 places that has ladders in each corners on that map? He was on the ladder the time he lagged, so assume that the photo was taken after the reported removed some parts of the map, so that it’ll look like he is flying. If you don’t believe me take a look :
View attachment 168834
Have you seen that piece of ladder left? I sure you do, so it is considered that the parts were just removed.

Second, Did you judge both images? I guess you did, but still it didn’t work. It was clearly that parts were remove, I can see some tiny pieces of the parts in this image : View attachment 168837 Saw that? You did, so don’t assume that the player who’s innocent enough removed that. How can the second image be the same position of his place if he removed that. It was captured on a different angle, that’s why.

Third, Differences of each image. Do you ever think that you should take what are the differences of every images? It’s not based on angles, it’s based on how you judge it. Well, look at this :
View attachment 168838 Missing piece right? So how about this one as well.
View attachment 168839 Missing as well, so fair enough. Image are completely the same, the block was removed and it is removed on the other image as well.

Fourth, we can’t still provide a better evidence here. So why not take a look at the measurement of each blocks and the player position.
Let’s take a look : 3x2
View attachment 168840 View attachment 168841
Now, on the players position.
View attachment 168842
It is 2 block high, so let’s look at the other one.
View attachment 168843
Looks like 1 and ½ block height right? It’s because it’s on the different angle.

Lastly, what does it really look like when you are really lagging or using hacks but pretending that you’re lagging?

Here :
View attachment 168845 Head is more likely looking down. ‘If hacking’
View attachment 168846
Head is not looking down, it can be above if ever. But no more no less. ‘If lagging’

This are the evidence I see based on this innocent player, If this is not enough for you. Well, I can not do anything about it, it’s their decision.

nice evidence

View reply.

 

[JasmineNotLost]

If you judge the both images, you’ll see he probably glitched out. I’ve seen the first image that the part of the map that has ladder was totally removed, and the player was on that part while he got glitched. So I think the reporter decided to remove the part where he/she can get this guy false ban. I’ll try to prove it, as long as I can.

First, have you noticed that he was on the ladder part of the map? isn’t there are 4 places that has ladders in each corners on that map? He was on the ladder the time he lagged, so assume that the photo was taken after the reported removed some parts of the map, so that it’ll look like he is flying. If you don’t believe me take a look :
View attachment 168834
Have you seen that piece of ladder left? I sure you do, so it is considered that the parts were just removed.

Second, Did you judge both images? I guess you did, but still it didn’t work. It was clearly that parts were remove, I can see some tiny pieces of the parts in this image : View attachment 168837 Saw that? You did, so don’t assume that the player who’s innocent enough removed that. How can the second image be the same position of his place if he removed that. It was captured on a different angle, that’s why.

Third, Differences of each image. Do you ever think that you should take what are the differences of every images? It’s not based on angles, it’s based on how you judge it. Well, look at this :
View attachment 168838 Missing piece right? So how about this one as well.
View attachment 168839 Missing as well, so fair enough. Image are completely the same, the block was removed and it is removed on the other image as well.

Fourth, we can’t still provide a better evidence here. So why not take a look at the measurement of each blocks and the player position.
Let’s take a look : 3x2
View attachment 168840 View attachment 168841
Now, on the players position.
View attachment 168842
It is 2 block high, so let’s look at the other one.
View attachment 168843
Looks like 1 and ½ block height right? It’s because it’s on the different angle.

Lastly, what does it really look like when you are really lagging or using hacks but pretending that you’re lagging?

Here :
View attachment 168845 Head is more likely looking down. ‘If hacking’
View attachment 168846
Head is not looking down, it can be above if ever. But no more no less. ‘If lagging’

This are the evidence I see based on this innocent player, If this is not enough for you. Well, I can not do anything about it, it’s their decision.

@ssunsett In case, you didn’t notice this evidence.

Nice!!!
I though he was standing on a block,but i guess i was wrong xd, its all up to ssunsett.

View reply.

 

[_xMaegann]

If you judge the both images, you’ll see he probably glitched out. I’ve seen the first image that the part of the map that has ladder was totally removed, and the player was on that part while he got glitched. So I think the reporter decided to remove the part where he/she can get this guy false ban. I’ll try to prove it, as long as I can.

First, have you noticed that he was on the ladder part of the map? isn’t there are 4 places that has ladders in each corners on that map? He was on the ladder the time he lagged, so assume that the photo was taken after the reported removed some parts of the map, so that it’ll look like he is flying. If you don’t believe me take a look :
View attachment 168834
Have you seen that piece of ladder left? I sure you do, so it is considered that the parts were just removed.

Second, Did you judge both images? I guess you did, but still it didn’t work. It was clearly that parts were remove, I can see some tiny pieces of the parts in this image : View attachment 168837 Saw that? You did, so don’t assume that the player who’s innocent enough removed that. How can the second image be the same position of his place if he removed that. It was captured on a different angle, that’s why.

Third, Differences of each image. Do you ever think that you should take what are the differences of every images? It’s not based on angles, it’s based on how you judge it. Well, look at this :
View attachment 168838 Missing piece right? So how about this one as well.
View attachment 168839 Missing as well, so fair enough. Image are completely the same, the block was removed and it is removed on the other image as well.

Fourth, we can’t still provide a better evidence here. So why not take a look at the measurement of each blocks and the player position.
Let’s take a look : 3x2
View attachment 168840 View attachment 168841
Now, on the players position.
View attachment 168842
It is 2 block high, so let’s look at the other one.
View attachment 168843
Looks like 1 and ½ block height right? It’s because it’s on the different angle.

Lastly, what does it really look like when you are really lagging or using hacks but pretending that you’re lagging?

Here :
View attachment 168845 Head is more likely looking down. ‘If hacking’
View attachment 168846
Head is not looking down, it can be above if ever. But no more no less. ‘If lagging’

This are the evidence I see based on this innocent player, If this is not enough for you. Well, I can not do anything about it, it’s their decision.

@ssunsett In case, you didn’t notice this evidence.

Yup, that’s what I tried to say about him and the ladder xD nice observations! Especially with the head angle. Most players climbing a ladder tend to look upward, while actual hackers tend to look downward, since flying hackers fly above players.

View reply.

 

[ssunsett]

The player has been unbanned. Enjoy your day.

View reply.