xjulu
New Member
- Apr 12, 2020
- 21
- 62
First of all, this ban appeal will actually mean something and have some evidence/players who contributed to this misunderstanding.
Eclipsels was falsely banned for having x-ray hacks. She was playing MM, finding innocents, however, her friends were in a voice call with her, and helping her find the innocents as spectators.
From the previous responses to appeals for eclipsels, a “diamond” was mentioned, but I’m really not sure how this applies to MM and finding innocents.
Some of the friends voice calling with eclipsels were:
@softclouds
@rxbynn
@Mintokuplayz
and they were helping her find innocents. (as stated previously)
If someone (or an entire group) has a grudge against her, they may have reported her together, the reasoning behind so many reports.
Another conclusion eclipsels and I came to was that staff had something against her. I would like to believe this isn’t true, as staff should be unbiased.
I really hope this does something for her.
On another note, if having spectator friends is against the rules, then a two day ban should be enough. (It shouldn’t be permanent)
I’m sorry that the Brokenlen’s staff team is getting this many appeals, but there is obvious reasoning behind that-confusion. Falsely accused and falsely banned players deserve a chance-and not just one small appeal.
If we have misunderstood something, please make it very clear to us about what she was banned for and the evidence that caused a staff member to ban her.
Thank you for taking your time to read.
Your’s truly, Julu.
Eclipsels was falsely banned for having x-ray hacks. She was playing MM, finding innocents, however, her friends were in a voice call with her, and helping her find the innocents as spectators.
From the previous responses to appeals for eclipsels, a “diamond” was mentioned, but I’m really not sure how this applies to MM and finding innocents.
Some of the friends voice calling with eclipsels were:
@softclouds
@rxbynn
@Mintokuplayz
and they were helping her find innocents. (as stated previously)
If someone (or an entire group) has a grudge against her, they may have reported her together, the reasoning behind so many reports.
Another conclusion eclipsels and I came to was that staff had something against her. I would like to believe this isn’t true, as staff should be unbiased.
I really hope this does something for her.
On another note, if having spectator friends is against the rules, then a two day ban should be enough. (It shouldn’t be permanent)
I’m sorry that the Brokenlen’s staff team is getting this many appeals, but there is obvious reasoning behind that-confusion. Falsely accused and falsely banned players deserve a chance-and not just one small appeal.
If we have misunderstood something, please make it very clear to us about what she was banned for and the evidence that caused a staff member to ban her.
Thank you for taking your time to read.
Your’s truly, Julu.
