SaJiqo
Notable Member
- Mar 10, 2019
- 395
- 500
Hello staffs and others, im here to show how uneven this server's report/banning system is.
Back in October this year, a friend of mine got banned because of the log of autoclick- and if you丨 know who then you know, keep it. I think this ban make no sence at all since you don't have valid proof that he "used autoclick while playing on BL".
I still remember that there was a report of a hacker who was playing MW and reached mid land before a fast-bridging PC without any bridge or trail left behind. He was obviously hacking, and thus the reporter reported.
It was invalid cuz of "not enough evidence", and staffs said he have to catch him "actually flying",or else it wasn't enough.
So by things above, if u didn't actually catch someone "using auto-click in brlns", then how can u just ban him by his log of the pc? This shouldn't be a valid evidence since u didn't capture the scene he was using it.
@ssunsett
Back in October this year, a friend of mine got banned because of the log of autoclick- and if you丨 know who then you know, keep it. I think this ban make no sence at all since you don't have valid proof that he "used autoclick while playing on BL".
I still remember that there was a report of a hacker who was playing MW and reached mid land before a fast-bridging PC without any bridge or trail left behind. He was obviously hacking, and thus the reporter reported.
It was invalid cuz of "not enough evidence", and staffs said he have to catch him "actually flying",or else it wasn't enough.
So by things above, if u didn't actually catch someone "using auto-click in brlns", then how can u just ban him by his log of the pc? This shouldn't be a valid evidence since u didn't capture the scene he was using it.
@ssunsett
