Something Bad I have been noticing... [Regarding Ban Appeals]

JamiePlayZ2005

Notable Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
19,798
Before reading this thread, Please acknowledge, that this is NOT meant to offend anyone, or pin-point any names, for I have done this mistake myself. :notworthy::speechless: :x



These days, I have been noticing, on the Ban Appeal that many players try to help the user and Staff. Some find the report and tag the staff required, while others who misunderstand the procedure, "spam" the thread, without realizing it. I just want these players (they do know who they are) to remember, that only 1 player is supposed to tag the staff and give the report, if found while the rest of the thread is meant only for staff and the user. If this sounds rude, I am dearly sorry, since I have spammed these Ban Appeals a lot of times, until @_PineappleDeath_ and @Phoe (Thanks! :D) made me realize my mistake. Please dearly avoid giving the following in any Ban Appeal, if not the user (or ofc if you're staff)

1: Avoid giving your opinions on the topic.
2: Avoid re-tagging any staff(s) unless required.
3: Avoid tagging staff members not required for the Appeal.
4: Avoid writing unnecessary Letters to the user/staff :p:rolleyes:
5: Avoid tagging the same staff member if he/she is already working on the appeal.
6: If an appeal has been solved but hasn’t been locked due to certain reasons, please avoid expressing your opinions on their previous situation.
7: Avoid being offended by this thread :laugh::lmao:
Thanks for Cooperating! :D
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure that you don't even have to tag the staff, since they are always watching the section.

These people are only useful when they missed a ban appeal that was posted 2 days or more.
View reply.
 
I'm pretty sure that you don't even have to tag the staff, since they are always watchibg the section
Sometimes, you do, since the staff who ban the player are often not watching the thread :p :lmao:
you know everyone is going to ignore this and keep spamming right?
and hOw ironic
Well, Atleast I tried to make them realize :( :notworthy:
View reply.
 
Sometimes, you do, since the staff who ban the player are often not watching the thread :p :lmao:
Well, Atleast I tried to make them realize :( :notworthy:

They're only useful when theres a ban appeal that wasnt answered 3 days or more. Most of them just keep tagging the staff even when it was posted 5 seconds ago...
View reply.
 
Also add

‘Avoid tagging the same staff member if he/she is already working on the appeal’

and

‘If an appeal has been solved but hasn’t been locked due to certain reasons, please avoid expressing your opinions on their previous situation.’
View reply.
 
Before reading this thread, Please acknowledge, that this is NOT meant to offend anyone, or pin-point any names, for I have done this mistake myself. :notworthy::speechless: :x



These days, I have been noticing, on the Ban Appeal that many players try to help the user and Staff. Some find the report and tag the staff required, while others who misunderstand the procedure, "spam" the thread, without realizing it. I just want these players (they do know who they are) to remember, that only 1 player is supposed to tag the staff and give the report, if found while the rest of the thread is meant only for staff and the user. If this sounds rude, I am dearly sorry, since I have spammed these Ban Appeals a lot of times, until @_PineappleDeath_ and @Phoe (Thanks! :D) made me realize my mistake. Please dearly avoid giving the following in any Ban Appeal, if not the user (or ofc if you're staff)

1: Avoid giving your opinions on the topic.
2: Avoid re-tagging any staff(s) unless required.
3: Avoid tagging staff members not required for the Appeal.
4: Avoid writing unnecessary Letters to the user/staff :p:rolleyes:
5: Avoid tagging the same staff member if he/she is already working on the appeal.
6: If an appeal has been solved but hasn’t been locked due to certain reasons, please avoid expressing your opinions on their previous situation.
7: Avoid being offended by this thread :laugh::lmao:
Thanks for Cooperating! :D
I reckon this also includes posting in Player Reports.
Some people (coughcough me coughcough) used to tag staff on all of the reports that didn’t have any tags.
View reply.
 
Well, this thread was meant only for those players, who should care... :(
View reply.
 
Ive seen so many people tagging staff to hack reports and ban appeals so many times it doesnt bother me anymore. I just think of them as just tryharding to be a staff : p

Maybe thats why they added a staff application form..
View reply.
 
most of the time, players are more useful then staff, All staff do is decide a verdict


aka im saying is that staff = judge, players = jury, banned = accused/defendant, reporter = the prosecutor

we need all thes to make a proper court room
View reply.
 
most of the time, players are more useful then staff, All staff do is decide a verdict


aka im saying is that staff = judge, players = jury, banned = accused/defendant, reporter = the prosecutor

we need all thes to make a proper court room
Jury is only worth working with, if the Jury know their work properly. :notworthy:
But if the Jury argues with the Judge, for a wrong reason,there is no need of Jury:unsure:
View reply.
 
most of the time, players are more useful then staff, All staff do is decide a verdict


aka im saying is that staff = judge, players = jury, banned = accused/defendant, reporter = the prosecutor

we need all thes to make a proper court room
Provided with evidence that the defendant is at wrong, no, i dont think so.

Barely any staff that i know, except plush, and some of the other old staff, forgive players and give others, even hackers a second chance in a 30 day ban. So no, i dont think so. UNLESS the staff or the so called judge asks for advice, then yes. Go ahead. But most of the time? I dont think so
View reply.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Back
Top