Teaming should be bannable

[racksondeck]

Playing Broken Lense for a while this mini-game has become completely unfair. I have joined games of Bow Spleef and have had as many as 7 people team at once. Its so bad to the point i am considering of leaving because majority of mini-games you play are full of people who team. Then they say you cant report us because teaming is not a bannable offense please fix this. I am making this suggestion to make Broken Lense a better place for everyone.

 

[karmatic]

Playing Broken Lense for a while this mini-game has become completely unfair. I have joined games of Bow Spleef and have had as many as 7 people team at once. Its so bad to the point i am considering of leaving because majority of mini-games you play are full of people who team. Then they say you cant report us because teaming is not a bannable offense please fix this. I am making this suggestion to make Broken Lense a better place for everyone.

I agree with your suggestion of teaming being bannable. It is already bannable in Skywars, but in other games like Murder Mystery it still isn't. I've seen many players teaming up in MM as the murderer and sheriff, and it just isn't fair for other players. Hopefully staff can consider your suggestion.

View reply.

 

[racksondeck]

I agree with your suggestion of teaming being bannable. It is already bannable in Skywars, but in other games like Murder Mystery it still isn't. I've seen many players teaming up in MM as the murderer and sheriff, and it just isn't fair for other players. Hopefully staff can consider your suggestion.

Hopefully currently there are 10 to 12 people teaming rn.

View reply.

 

[withy]

Hopefully currently there are 10 to 12 people teaming rn.

I also believe that teaming should be bannable but another way to possibly get rid of the teamers is to lower xp ratings. The amount of xp that Bowspleef gives at the end of the round attracts players to camp at Bow. Lowering it could mean less campers. Sorry if this was a old thread or if I’m spamming!

View reply.